Is it right for these people to ask the government to seize someone else’s land?
Wednesday, June 9th, 2010 at
7:46 am
The place where flight 93 crashed. The person who owned the property wouldn’t sell to the families of the crash victims. So the families were asking the govt. to seize the land from this guy just so they could build a memorial there. Would they like it if the govt. seized all of their houses?
Repossession
Related articles:
- Charity Calls On Government To Help People That Struggle With Mortgages More than one million households in England could face repossession in the coming year, warns the homelessness charity Shelter. The organisation has seen a steep rise in people seeking...
- Why does fight-or-flight hurt us in modern society? Like when people were apes, fight-or-flight was beneficial. When confronted with a saber toothed tiger, for example, it makes sense to beat the crap out of it or try...
- if someone crashes on government property while on cellphone, whats their liability? So we have to do this for my legal and ethics class and I can not find the information. Basically the defendant was trying to make an emergency cellphone...
- How do I get a title for my car that was purchased at government auction? I purchased a car from a private owner who advertised it with no title. The private party purchased it from a government auction a few years ago and was...
- Bangkok Land and Sky; a Brief Insight Into Real Estate and House Sales House 100% ownership?When it comes to housing and real estate, long term residency in Bangkok is still as an attractive prospect as it ever was. Not only amongst the...
Tagged with: Crash Victims • Flight 93 • Government Land • People
Filed under: property crash
‘right’ and govt seldom go together. Heck, they seize land to build shopping malls! Tho wrong, this will probably go down. Sorry state of affairs.
Dit is het land van VRIJ. Maar als de overheid u iets wil doen of iets willen zullen zij het nemen.
Hoe opnieuw vrij zijn de V.S.?
it’s an emotional response,and irrational…visit cemetaries,not accident sites…
The only precedents for such a thing are the actions protected under Eminent Domain.
This is ridiculous though. The owner of this land should have every right to refuse sale.
For the good of the government can take land from you if they think it is for the good of the government can take land from you if they think it is for the people which is for.
The government can take land from you if they think its just to widen unused road.
The government can take land from you if they think it is bull usually its fair but there should be something like memorial just to widen unused road.
God, I hope these people don’t succeed. So wrong.
and for ‘Mando’; Vuelve a su propio país si usted don’ t tiene gusto de él aquí. Nosotros don’ ¡t le quiere! Y si usted don’ t vivo aquí, entonces STFU.